PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE OPERATIONS -PSYOPS-
ILLEGALLY USED IN
OPERATION LIGHTNING STRIKE
     The United States has led the world in championing Human Rights, and has signed several United NATIONS Instruments to promote respect for the observance of civil and political freedoms. EXAMPLES:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(16 December 1966)
ART 9
"No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest and detention"
"Anyone who is arrested shall be informed at the time of arrest, of the reasons for the arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him"
"Anyone ARRESTED or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power . . ."
ART 14
"Everyone charged with a criminal offense shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law"
"To be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him"
"Not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt"
"No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his HONOR and reputation"
THE US GOVERNMENT IS VIOLATING THESE HUMAN RIGHTS COVENANTS IN ITS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officers
(Adopted 17 December 1979)
ART 2
"In the performance of their duty, law enforcement officials shall respect and protect human dignity and maintain and uphold the human rights of all persons"
ART 5
"No law enforcement official may inflict, instigate or tolerate any act of torture or other cruel or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;"
The Declaration defines torture as follows;
" . . . torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental is intentionally inflicted by or at the instigation of a public official on a third person for such purposes as to obtain from him or a third person information or confession."
("The term "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" has not been defined by the General Assembly but should be interpreted so as to extend the widest possible protection against abuses, whether physical or mental .")
ART 8
"Law enforcement officials shall respect the law and the present code. They shall also, to the best of their capability, prevent and rigorously oppose any violations of them."
tHE US FEDERAL POLICE AGENCIES ARE NOW VIOLATING THESE PROVISIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES
THE "WAREHOUSE TREATMENT" AGAINST THE NASA-13
EVIDENCE OF USE OF ILLEGAL PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERROGATION METHODS BY U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENTS IN VIOLATION OF U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS
EXTENSIVE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE RESEARCH INTO THE COERCIVE PERSUASION (CP) METHODS DEVELOPED BY THE CHINESE COMMUNISTS IN THE KOREAN WAR PERIOD
MILITARY PSYOPS
INVOLVEMENT IN PRESENT DAY DOMESTIC POLICE OPERATIONS: APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT AUTHORIZATION AND OPERATING DOCUMENTS
U.S. PUBLIC LAW PROHIBITS THE USE OF PSYOPS ON ITS OWN FORCES OR POPULACE!
BUT THE LINE BETWEEN MILITARY AND THE POLICE IS DISAPPEARING,
AS SEEN IN OPERATION LIGHTNING STRIKE
U.S. Government Documents
(U) - U.S. Army Field Manual 33-1, Psychological Operations
(U) - U.S. Army Field Manual 34-52, Intelligence INTERROGATION
(U) - U.S. Army STP 34-97E, Interrogation Training Manual
* (SN-F) FM 34-60A, Counter Intelligence Operations (U) 6 June 1989
* (S) TC 34-5, Human Intelligence Operations (U) 3 October 1988
*Unclassified document numbers and titles provided for Reference
only.
U.S. ARMY FIELD MANUAL FM 34-52
INTELLIGENCE INTERROGATION (POW’s)
CHAP. 3 - THE INTERROGATION PROCESS (ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL)
DEVELOPING RAPPORT - "HELP THE SOURCE TO RATIONALIZE
HIS GUILT" -- what Guilt ??
"EXONERATE THE SOURCE FROM GUILT"
"FLATTER THE SOURCE"
DIRECT - FUTILITY - LOVE OF COMRADES
DIRECT - FEAR UP - INCENTIVE" - how?
COOPERATION"
     "FEAR-UP HARSH" OR FEAR-UP MILD OR
     PRIDE AND EGO UP
     PRIDE AND EGO DOWN
     AUTHORITIES"
     INTERROGATORS"
FM34-52 PROVIDES EXTENSIVE WARNINGS TO MI INTERROGATORS RE. GENEVA CONVENTION AND UCMJ RESTRICTIONS AGAINST COERCION AND THREATS BUT IS ENTIRELY PSYCHOLOGICAL!
IF SO, WHY WAS IT USED IN OPERATION LIGHTNING STRIKE
FIELD MANUEL 35-52 QUESTIONING
DOD/DOD TRAINED INVESTIGATORS WHO PLAYED KEY ROLES IN
OPERATION LIGHTNING STRIKE INVESTIGATIONS/ENTRAPMENTS
PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERROGATIONS
(AFIS)
INTELLIGENCE (MI INTERROGATOR)
WHAT WAS THE DOD DOING INVESTIGATING NASA CORRUPTION CASES?